The previous post was rather positive and cheerful, much to my surprise. It took me a while to recover from that. The post did not exactly mirror my state of mind in the hours leading up to the delivery of the oven and during its installation. I feared the worst. I don't expect anything good when it comes to workmen, repairs, or anything to do with building infrastructure. Things are oftentimes not done as I would expect them or in ways that make sense to me.
Take my place of work as an example. The lifts are regularly out of order, as if they were there to provide backup for the stairs. Steam leaks that take down heating, the hot water supply and sterilization facilities occur regularly. At least once a month, there's a building-wide email warning of an impending emergency steam shut-down so another leak can be patched. It would certainly be better and in the long run cheaper to install a new reliable system instead of patching the old one again and again, only for new leaks to break open only weeks later, but no one seems to take this option into consideration.
That is because doing it right is not how it's done here. Making things work is usually the goal, fudging things to arrive at a temporary solution, to give the appearance of a solution, in other words. Most external building work is done with a brush and a bucket of thick paint. Coat after coat is applied until the paint itself provides structural stability while the walls below are rotting away. Indoors, duct tape, glue and putty play similar roles.
I expected the oven business to go along those lines, and initially it did. When the technician unpacked the appliance, the first thing to tumble from the box was a handle that had broken off from the oven door. That's how the thing had been delivered. Behind the door were a number of trays that made sense and various implements that didn't. There were grips supposed to clip to the trays that I still haven't figured out how to use and a floppy piece of aluminum that looked as if it had fallen off somewhere. The technician explained that it was a guard to keep the oven door open while using the grill. This seemed strange to me. Why would I want to keep the oven door open? Was the idea to use the grill as a fireplace and warm the kitchen on cold winter days? There was no good answer, but it didn't matter. Even though both of us tried, we found no way of locking the guard in place. It might have been too bent out of shape before its first use already.
It's entirely possible that the thing was bent out of shape by design. It's not always easy to tell function from design. I was reminded of this the other day when washing my hands at Imperial. Washing your hands in the UK is often a journey into the dark past. Many homes have separate faucets for hot and cold water. They are called period fittings by estate agents as if functional moribundity were something to be proud of. I've never understood the appeal.
In many homes, mine included, appeal plays no role in their continued existence. It's simply a question of money. If a fifty-year old faucet works, why replace it? I understand this. What I don't understand is why you would replace it with something equally obsolete. This is what I observed at Imperial the other day: Two faucets controlled one spout, but the hot and cold water weren't mixed. Instead, two parallel streams of water exited the spout, scalding my index finger while chilling my thumb to the bone.
Hot and cold
Three sets of questions are in order.
- Who invented this and why? What problem is this a solution for? When would you ever want hot and cold water separate?
- Who built this? Who thought money could be made from not mixing hot and cold water?
- Who bought this? Who decided it would be a good idea to install this idiocy in the bathroom of a university that carries in its name the word technology, referring, presumably, to the cutting edge of it?
There is so much that I will never understand about this country.
No comments:
Post a Comment